Heading Logo

League of Women Voters sponsors Great Decisions discussions

Published: February 26, 2017 12:00 AM

The League of Women Voters of Hudson invites citizens to discuss important topics of U.S. foreign policy at Laurel Lake on Tuesday mornings through March 21.

Sessions run from 10 11:15 a.m. The Hudson group has been sponsoring these discussions for 35 years. Each session starts with a 25-minute video on the topic followed by active discussion based on the briefing book published by the Foreign Policy Association.

The cost to participate is $25 for the briefing book which can be attained by emailing Karen Leith at KPL7@aol.com.

Topics and dates include:

Feb. 28: U.S. Foreign Policy and Petroleum

[Article continues below]

What is the effect of U.S. petroleum security on foreign policy? For 45 years, the country has alternated between periods of energy security and insecurity, sometimes able to wield petroleum as a useful instrument of foreign policy, sometimes not. Despite the so-called "energy revolution," the U.S. today is by no means disentangled from foreign dependence and global trends. In order to be successful, policymakers must recognize both petroleum security circumstances and patterns in the relationship between petroleum and foreign policy.

March 7: Latin America's Political Pendulum

The pendulum of Latin American politics is swinging rightward once again. Yet as the "pink tide" recedes, the forces of change have more to do with socioeconomics than ideology.

Dramatic economic and political crises have coincided in countries like Brazil and Venezuela. Still, the final result for Latin America may be the emergence of centrist, pragmatic modes of governance, and with them, opportunities for the U.S. to improve relations. The new administration must look beyond the neoliberal model of the 1990s, and develop an approach to relations fit for the 21st century.

March 14: Prospects for Afghanistan and Pakistan

[Article continues below]

Major internal conflict has plagued Afghanistan for four decades. The U.S., for its part, has conducted military operations in the country nearly continuously since 9/11. Today, war with the Taliban persists, and tensions between the U.S. and Pakistan have gradually deteriorated. As his time in office drew to a close, President Obama limited further withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The incoming administration has a choice: will it maintain the status quo, completely reverse the Obama administration drawdown or withdraw completely? Does the U.S. face a no win situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan?

March 21: Nuclear Security: The Enduring Challenge of Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear nonproliferation was a top priority for the Obama administration. While the Iran Deal was a diplomatic victory toward this end, major threats persist from both state and non-state actors. Countries like North Korea, Russia, and India and Pakistan continue to challenge nonproliferation efforts.

The possibility that terrorists will carry out an attack using a "dirty bomb," made from captured nuclear materials, looks increasingly real. In a fractious world, which way forward for U.S. nuclear security policy?

Become part of America's largest discussion program on world affairs. Each year, eight topics out of the most critical global issues facing America are chosen by a panel of experts. This year we tackle critical issues from U.N reform to climate change and the rise of ISIS.

In this time of transition and change, it is important to not only be knowledgeable, but also to voice informed opinions. Part of our deliberations must include the possibilities of changes in direction.

Rate this article

Do you want to leave a comment?   Please Log In or Register to comment.